81.5 F
Coral Gables
Friday, May 8, 2026
May 8 , 2026
Home Blog Page 11

Hurricanes report card: Miami’s 26-win turnaround earns high marks

The Hurricanes Men’s basketball season was put to an end on Sunday, March 22, losing to the No. 2 seed Purdue Boilermakers 79-69 in the second round of the NCAA Tournament. Despite the loss, the program’s 26-9 season marked an incredible turnaround following the team’s 7-24 record last season, many thanks to first-time head coach Jai Lucas. 

With the season over, it’s time to look back at the players responsible for the team’s bounceback year.

Jai Lucas: A+  

In his inaugural season as head coach, Lucas did an excellent job of turning the program around. He brought in a completely new batch of players this season, through both recruiting and the transfer portal. He helped lead them to a 26-9 season, a third place finish in the ACC and an 80-66 win over No. 10 Missouri. Expect big things to come for the Hurricanes as it seems like they found their guy at the helm in year two under Lucas.

Malik Reneau: A 

Averaging 19 points and seven rebounds per game, senior Malik Reneau was the offensive engine for the Canes while also being dominant on the boards. His ability to be the first scoring option while also being a defensive presence made him the cornerstone of the team. Those numbers earned Reneau First Team All-ACC honors throughout his 2025-26 campaign. Without him, it’s hard to say that the Hurricanes would make the tournament. It will be tough for Lucas to find a replacement that can score and rebound at his level.

Tre Donaldson: A- 

Donaldson ran the point all season for the Hurricanes, averaging 16 points, six assists and four rebounds per game, leading to a Third Team All-ACC performance. His ability to distribute the ball while still being a legitimate scoring threat made him a massive contributor. Donaldson was a large contributor to the team’s success, showing a level of point guard play that hasn’t been seen in some time. The Auburn and Michigan transfer’s impact will be felt without him next season.

David Lebowitz, Photo Editor/ Senior Guard Tre Donaldson shoots a three point shot against Purdue on March 22, 2026 at the Enterprise Center in St. Louis, Missouri.

Tru Washington: C+ 

Washington, the junior transfer from New Mexico, started the season in the starting five, but eventually lost his spot to true freshman Dante Allen. The coming weeks he was away from the team for personal reasons, before returning to the team for the home stretch. Washington was able to pick up the slack whenever Donaldson was out and brought some firepower off the bench with 12 points and two steals per game. Washington’s incredible defense was at display but was up and down on offense, leading to his C+ grade.

Shelton Henderson: A 

It’s always impressive when you see a true freshman jump right into a starting lineup, but Henderson ended up becoming one of the best players on the team just weeks into the season. Averaging 12 points and four rebounds, he was a true two-way playmaker. His ability to be physical and get to the hoop on offense and lock down on defense made him a valuable piece to the puzzle this season. Things should only get better for Henderson as Lucas continues to develop him.

Ernest Udeh Jr.: A 

Ernest Udeh Jr. was the team’s big man through and through. Averaging nine rebounds and 1.4 blocks per game, he was the team’s defensive anchor and paced the team in boards as well. He was also a legitimate concern for defenses on the fast break, as he punched home alley-oops left and right over the course of the season. Udeh proved to be a true cornerstone of the team, and earned himself an A grade. The Kansas and TCU transfer’s performance this year led him to the ACC’s All-Defensive team, a hole that Lucas will need to replace next season.

David Lebowitz, Photo Editor/ Senior Center Ernest Udeh Jr. slams the ball on March 12, 2026 at the Spectrum Center in Charlotte, North Carolina.

Dante Allen: B 

After starting the season on the bench, the true freshman earned himself a starting job midway through the year and became a strong contributor down the stretch. A strong defender and decent scoring option, Allen was a solid starter for the team. However, of the starters, Allen had the most minimal impact, with seven points, three rebounds, and two assists per game. His 3-point shooting is there and so is his defense, and another year under Lucas will allow him to grow into a key rotational piece next season.

Rest of team: C 

Lucas ran a small, seven-man rotation this season, meaning most bench players saw minimal action. Some players got some minutes during midseason games or blowouts, but not enough to prove a significant impact. 

David Lebowitz, Photo Editor/ Freshman Guard Dante Allen celebrates after beating Virginia Tech on February 17, 2026.

Miami women’s golf places 15th at Clemson Invitational 

0

The Miami women’s golf team came in 15th place at the Clemson Invitational on Sunday, posting a three-day total of 895. 

The Hurricanes finished 31-over-par for the 54-hole tournament, recording team rounds of 294, 299 and 302. Florida took home the team title with a finish 16-under-par, eight strokes ahead of runner-up Arkansas. 

Stella Jelinek and Ashleen Kaur led the way for Miami, finishing in a tie for 36th place. Both golfers turned in a 5-over-par 221 score for the weekend. Jelinek remained consistent across all three rounds, while Kaur’s weekend was highlighted by a second-round 72. 

Barbora Bujáková tied for 67th at 12-over-par. After struggling in the earlier stages of the invitational, Bujáková found her rhythm in the final round, going 1-over-par 73. 

Cloe Amion Villarino and Rebekah Gardner rounded out the Hurricanes’ lineup, finishing in a tie for 75th at 14-over-par. Amion Villarino opened the tournament strong with a team low round of 71 on the first day before sliding in the final two rounds. 

The Hurricanes now shift their focus to the postseason with the ACC Championship in Wilmington, North Carolina teeing off April 16. 

Charlie Puth’s new album ‘Whatever’s Clever!’ just isn’t clever enough

“What if there was a song that…” is the opening of the question Charlie Puth is known for asking on his social media accounts, as he reveals a behind the scenes look of his creative process while producing his music. 

Ahead of March 27, his latest studio album release, however, his platforms went quiet, his teasers were more cryptic, and his fans were in the dark as to what sound his fourth record would embrace. 

That was until, October 16, when he released the lead single, “Changes.” The song makes sense as the opener for the album. It’s an obvious theme given the obvious “change” in his personal life as a recent husband to Brooke Puth and father to newborn son Jude Puth. 

The instrumental transitioning into the bridge is the first proof that the album is about its musical composition above all else.

When it first dropped, I wasn’t the biggest fan, and I took this as a sign that this new era may not be for me. I’m a fan of all of Puth’s previous works, but find the most quality in his first two records, “Nine Track Mind” and “Voicenotes.” 

His third body of work, “Charlie” was enjoyable to me, as someone who was simply excited for any new music from him, with the help of its infectiously catchy melodies. However, the artistic direction was a bit generic and lacked both lyrical depth and sonic experimentation. 

“Whatever’s Clever!” has the same lyrical weakness. Nearly four years after the release of “Charlie,” Puth does take more advantage of his endless music knowledge to seamlessly include instrumentals and integrate the styles of the artists featured on some songs. 

But when it comes to delivering a message of his own, “Whatever’s Clever!” falls short.

“Beat Yourself Up” follows as the second single, revealing the cliché tone of the album, as Puth sings about how mistakes don’t define you. 

“Cry” featuring Kenny G reminds listeners that Charlie Puth isn’t just a musician. It’s not just his job. It’s his passion. 

As both an admirer and an engineer of music, and a 2013 graduate of Berklee College of Music, Puth having the name Kenny G on his work is his “I made it” moment. 

This song steers focus away from the lyrics as it repeats the title often, drawing attention to Kenny’s smooth saxophone playing layered with Puth’s serene, comforting vocals. 

The beginning of “Washed Up” hints to me it’s about to be one of my favorites. In this song, his voice reminds me of his early songs like “One Call Away,” but with the maturity of his developed production skills. 

I love the verses, and the chord progressions make the transitions from verse to prechorus to chorus effortless and clean, feeling like a wave gently washing up the shore. With the title being “Washed Up,” it’s a synesthetic experience.

“New Jersey” featuring Ravyn Lenae and “Don’t Meet Your Heroes” are more songs that feel boxed in by clichés. His epiphanies in the lyrics don’t delve a layer deeper than any pre-existing concepts. It just doesn’t feel new. 

“Home” is easily the best song on the album. A collaboration with Hikaru Utada, this song veers off from Puth’s usual rhythm and embraces Utada’s style, unlike the rest of the songs with features on the album.

The song proves it would be beneficial to his art for Charlie Puth to step out of his sound, as when he emulates other artists’ sounds and creates something of his own out of the inspiration, it creates some of his best work.

“Hey Brother” is another strong track on the album, and its transition into “Sideways” mimics the chronological progression of his sound. 

As the gentle drums in “Hey Brother,” reminiscent of “Left Right Left” on “Nine Track Mind,” begin to quiet, the groovy RNB “Sideways” featuring Coco Jones begins, resembling his shift into the widely-loved “Voicenotes” era. 

“Love In Exile” is accompanied by McDonald and Kenny Loggins. It feels like a sort-of-80s-style song to match the nostalgic aesthetic of the album’s visuals, but it was forgettable. 

The second to last song, “Until It Happens To You” features Jeff Goldblum (a bit randomly) who speaks about empathy, carrying into Puth’s singing. 

The album closes with “I Used to Be Cringe,” Puth’s intention for it to be candid. Inspired by Taylor Swift’s lyricism that features storytelling, vulnerability and depth, Puth only scratches the surface of his truth. 

His personality does come through in it, but it just doesn’t feel like a serious enough topic to write into a ballad. 

Less than a week after the record’s release, Puth dropped an extended version of the album, with a thirteenth track: “Reply to This.” This one’s for the fans who have been waiting for its release for six years – its style and lyrics fitting right into “Voicenotes” more than “Whatever’s Clever!”

It doesn’t feel like there’s a target audience for this album. For someone who enjoys lighthearted pop music or even his past records, like myself, this album doesn’t feel like it’s for me. For someone who enjoys jazz, it doesn’t feel like there’s enough of that either. 

Puth has an excellent understanding of music, but is trapped by the pop-sound he has committed himself to producing. 

The scattered elements of jazz feel like attempted saves at making “Whatever’s Clever!” unique, but at the end of the day, it’s not enough to outweigh the one-dimensionality of everything else. 

Rating: 2.5/5

Black Fancy’s long road to Cuttin’ Headz and Ultra Miami

Black Fancy’s, whose real name is Samuele Tranquille, road to Ultra Miami started years before he ever touched an American stage. He was just an artist from rural Italy trying to get the attention of the Martinez Brothers, a DJ duo. Now, all that hard work and patience has paid off. 

After becoming the first official artist signed to the Martinez Brothers’ label Cuttin Headz, that long pursuit has led him to a milestone weekend: the release of his debut Cuttin’ Headz EP and his first-ever performance in the United States at Ultra Miami. 

The signing marked a major shift for Cuttin’ Headz as it moved more explicitly into artist development.

Black Fancy’s story is not one of overnight discovery. In a conversation at Ultra, he described a process that stretched close to a decade. He followed the Martinez Brothers across Europe, sent them music for years, and kept going through the silence and rejection. 

Eventually, they began playing some of his tracks. Then came the real-life connection: after partying and getting closer a deeper sense of trust emerged. By early 2025, that persistence finally turned into something concrete when they reached out with the idea of bringing him into the Cuttin’ Headz fold.

When you think about what Cuttin’ Headz means in this scene, his signing is huge. The label has always felt like a direct reflection of the Martinez Brothers — rooted in New York, grounded in house and techno, but never boxed in by just one lane of dance music. 

So for Black Fancy to become the first artist they officially sign says a lot. It feels like the label is moving into a new phase now. Not just dropping records here and there, but actually putting time and belief into artists and helping them grow. 

And the way they brought him in made that pretty clear. He did not come across like just another name on the roster. He felt like someone they genuinely wanted to back.

That made Ultra feel like more than just another booking. It felt like the visible payoff of a much longer process. His March 29 set at 2 p.m. was his first chance to introduce himself to an American crowd at scale. 

Although the time slot did not fully show him the might of the U.S. audience he may eventually reach, he still felt the difference right away. 

What he noticed most was the energy. Even with an early set time, he described the American crowd as intense, excited and fully willing to dance.

His background also matters to the music itself. Black Fancy’s Italian and African descent are essential to his sound. He traced that connection back to his childhood where there was music in the house and all throughout family life. 

That mix of raw percussion and soulful movement is part of what drew the Martinez Brothers to him in the first place. Recent coverage around his signing has described him as part of a newer generation of artists on the rise, even noting his earlier recognition as a “Future of Dance” artist by 1001Tracklists.

For Black Fancy, though, it’s about how he never stopped pushing. He kept sending music. He kept showing up. And now the same artists he spent years chasing are helping shape what comes next. 

His biggest dream, he said, is still ahead of him: a back-to-back with the Martinez Brothers themselves. After Ultra, that no longer feels impossible. It just feels like the next step.

Canes slug through FGCU 12-4 in interstate matchup

Miami fans have come to associate “My Way” by Fetty Wap with St. Louis and a batting average well into the .400s.

Today, it prefaced a soaring three-run shot.

With two men on in the bottom of the third, right fielder and St. Louis native Derek Williams roped a ball over the scoreboard in left, sending it out of sight into Coral Gables’ picturesque skyline.

The Hurricanes faced off against the Florida Gulf Coast University Eagles on Tuesday, March 31, 2026. Their 12-4 home win comes off the heels of a road series win against Clemson.

After a four-pitch walk to open the game, TJ Coats gathered himself for his first start of the year and forced three outs on a flyout and subsequent double play.

Miami struck first with second baseman Jake Ogden rounding the bases on an errant pickoff attempt, a passed ball and a fielder’s choice off the bat of Williams. 

The Eagles scored in similar fashion, however, with a passed ball driving in a run to tie the game at one-a-piece. 

After a brief struggle for Coats in the top of the third, he forced a ground ball to Ogden for the final out, stranding three FGCU runners.

David Lebowitz, Photo Editor/ Senior Jake Ogden and Fifth-Year Senior Derek Williams talk between an at-bat on February 22, 2026.

After the nail-biting top of the third, Ogden jumped on the first pitch he saw — lining a ball down the right-field-line for a double. A walk for designated hitter Alex Sosa brought up Williams, who picked his pitch and launched it, putting the Canes ahead 4-1.

The 373-foot blast marked Williams’ 11th homer of the season, with righty reliever Simon Aluko replacing Trevor Rodgers on the mound for the Eagles shortly after.

FGCU responded, knocking Miami’s lead down to one after designated hitter Sebastian Lippman sent another ball to left for a two-run-homer.

Despite this, Aluko began to lose the zone, and the Canes capitalized. Scoring two on a Jake Ogden RBI single and three walks before he’d recorded an out, FGCU made another pitching change, limiting the damage.

Coats’ day would end as well, being replaced in the fifth with lefty Jake Dorn taking over on the bump.

Coats threw four full innings, surrendering three walks and striking out two. The Nebraska transfer has cemented himself as a regular middle-relief asset from the bullpen — now with 22 strikeouts on the season and a 4.05 ERA.

After the first scoreless inning of the game, the Canes added five to their lead. Following back-to-back singles from center fielder Fabio Peralta and Ogden, Sosa drove them both in with an RBI double — his thirteenth of the season.

First baseman Brylan West would go on to display his devastating power, driving Sosa in and exceeding Williams’ blast with a 386-foot two-run home run.

David Lebowitz, Photo Editor/ Junior Catcher Alex Sosa swings at an incoming pitch against Florida on Febraury 27, 2026.

A double for catcher Alonso Alvarez would give shortstop Vance Shehan his first RBI of the night as he drove him in on a single to center, only to be thrown out stealing second moments later, ending a monstrous inning at the plate for the Canes.

After another shutdown frame for Dorn and the defense, third baseman Daniel Cuvet drove a double to the right field wall for an RBI double. With that, every member of the Canes starting lineup had notched a hit on the day. 

Dorn was replaced with another lefty, Lonzo Drummond, in the eighth. Partly to the credit of Dorn, Drummond had a breathy lead to work with.

Spanning three innings, Dorn recorded four strikeouts against two walks and one hit, conceding no runs in the process. The nine-run lead at the time of his exit lay as tribute to his impressive outing, alongside the offense’s contributions.

With a scoreless two-strikeout inning for Drummond, graduate transfer catcher Jackson Hugus laced his first hit as a Hurricane on a chopping grounder over the shortstop, pinch hitting for Alvarez.

Tate DeRias took over for Drummond in the ninth, allowing one on an RBI double to the right-center fence, but nonetheless closing a blowout win for Miami.

Notably, the Hurricanes’ pitching staff collectively snapped a 45-game hit streak for Javier Gorostola.

Miami plays Virginia Tech next in a conference matchup on Friday, April 3, 2026. First pitch at Mark Light Field is set for 7 p.m.

David Lebowitz, Photo Editor/ The Hurricanes meet at the mound against Florida on Febrauary 27, 2026.

Some days, it’s easier being Canadian

I was in Morocco, shopping in the Souks of Marrakesh, when a shop owner asked where my friends and I were from.

Without hesitation, my friend answered, “Canada.” 

It wasn’t the first time I’d heard American students abroad use that lie. Europeans often stereotype Americans as loud, rude or self-centered — perceptions now compounded by widespread disapproval of President Donald Trump. But, this was the first time I understood the answer as something more than social convenience. It was about safety.

Just two days before we touched down in Africa, the U.S. urged citizens to leave parts of the Middle East amid escalating tensions tied to U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iran. Morocco, on the opposite side of North Africa, wasn’t under threat, but distance doesn’t eliminate impact. 

While the Moroccan government has maintained strategic ties with Israel, public sentiment has been far less unified. Following the Israeli and U.S. attacks on Iran, demonstrators have protested against an Islamic country they feel connected to, reflecting broader solidarity within the Muslim world. 

Even without direct involvement, Morocco faces the ripple effects — rising energy costs, inflation and potential drops in tourism. With the U.S. tied to these pressures, it risks a negative reception overseas.

While I wasn’t in direct danger, I was entering a country with a long, complex and often divided political relationship with Israel and  the U.S.  — one where it’s difficult to anticipate how someone might view the war, or respond to me as an American. 

That unease isn’t limited to Africa. Across Europe, leaders have distanced themselves from U.S. military actions. Officials in countries like Germany and France have made it clear they do not see the conflict as theirs. 

Germany’s Defense Minister, Boris Pistorius, told reporters “This is not our war, we have not started it.” Echoing Germany’s stance, French President Emmanuel Macron said at the start of a cabinet meeting on the Middle East conflict “We are not party to the conflict.”

In response, Trump publicly criticized allied leaders, straining already fragile perceptions of the U.S. abroad, and those perceptions matter. Surveys show a sharp decline in how Americans are viewed internationally in recent years, largely influenced by the re-election of President Donald Trump. 

European views of Americans have shifted drastically. Approval plummeted from 61% in Oct 2024 to 25% by Feb 2026 according to EU News, with more than half of Europe’s nations now having an unfavorable view. 

Just the other day, my roommates and I were greeted by a restaurant host who ushered us inside for drinks. As we began talking, he asked, “You’re from the U.S.?” 

This time, we said yes — and without missing a beat, he replied, “F**k Trump.”

Our waiter went on to explain that he was from Cuba, a country Trump recently said he could “do anything [he] want[s] with” amid oil-blockade negotiations. The host went on to say that Cuba deserved to be left alone before guiding us to our table.

Encounters like these reveal how my identity as an American alone can spark outrage, even in something as ordinary as being seated at a restaurant. In these moments, I often find myself falling silent — feeling a sense of guilt, yet also aware of how little control I have over the decisions of my country. 

I don’t even feel comfortable telling Europeans what I study. Every time I tell someone I study journalism I’m met with the same question: “FOX or CNN?” They treat our country’s political division as a kind of game, pulling my arm to see which “side” I lean on.

Even a customs officer at the airport, after asking me what I studied, smirked before asking me, “What are your thoughts on Ukraine and Russia? Does Russia have a right to defend itself?”

If I’m not being blamed or ridiculed, I’m being prodded, questioned and tested. There is a strange fascination with U.S. politics, with our views on international policy and global affairs.

It makes it harder to separate individual identity from national reputation — a reputation I’m not always proud of. 

I’m not alone. Nearly three quarters of those living in the U.S. believe Americans have a bad reputation overseas, and 80% blame recent politics, such as the tariffs, skewing what Europeans think of the U.S., according to Upgraded Points.

Being American doesn’t mean agreeing with American policy, or the current administration. Still, it raises a difficult question: is it safe to be one?

For a long time, that question was more about perception than risk. Now, with rising global tensions, it feels more real  — less about embarrassment, more about uncertainty. 

Some days, it’s just easier to be Canadian.

Not all podcasts deserve your trust

Only 11% of Americans had ever listened to a podcast a decade ago. Today, the number is 57%. The exponential growth of podcasts’ popularity can be attributed to the low barriers for entry — almost anyone can make a podcast, and almost anyone can listen. 

At face value, a podcasts’ accessibility sounds promising, promoting the democratization of information-sharing. And, to an extent, it provides that promise.

A study from the Pew Research Center finds that podcasts can increase engagement with news and public affairs, particularly among younger audiences who are less likely to consume traditional media. 

But, this argument assumes that all information within podcasts is equally credible, or at least that listeners can reliably distinguish between credible and non-credible sources.

That assumption does not hold up. 

The features that make podcasts valuable — accessibility, long-form storytelling and personal tone — also make them uniquely vulnerable to misinformation. There are no consistent safeguards separating well-researched context from speculation or outright lies.

A Brookings Institution study analyzing 36,603 episodes across 79 political podcasts found that at least 5% of episodes contained false or unsubstantiated claims. More concerning, 71% of those shows had shared misinformation at least once, and 15% of these shows had done so more than 50 times. 

This pattern makes sense when you think about how podcasts function. Unlike traditional journalism, podcasts operate in a space with almost no structural accountability. Most of the time, podcasts don’t allow for oversight or editing since the person speaking is the one in charge. This makes fact-checking on large scales difficult

Spoken audio has to be turned into something that can be analyzed, which usually means transcribing it and using language-processing tools. Even then, going through huge amounts of content to spot misinformation isn’t easy.

Beyond what information or misinformation is shared, we must consider how it is presented. Podcasts prey on intimacy. You might listen to them alone; at the gym, walking to class, driving. Their tone is casual, so it can feel like you’re on the phone with a friend. The longform, episodic format of podcasting gives hosts the time and space to repeat information. 

Ease of processing, or cognitive fluency, is an important input in assessing truth. This means that we are more likely to believe statements we hear repeatedly. 

Hosts hold authority, because they are familiar and consistent, not because they are correct or experts, which morphs into a substitute for credibility. 

Dylan Long, associate director of the Civic Synergy Program through the Hanley Democracy Center, believes there are both pros and cons to people using podcasts as sources of information. 

They can absolutely make information more accessible, especially for people who do not read long articles or follow traditional news sources,” Long said. “At the same time, the barrier to entry is so low that anyone with a microphone, confidence and a loyal audience can present [their] opinion as fact.”

He recognizes that in some cases, podcasts are useful, but that we should be critical of who we choose to listen to.

“Podcasts can make people intellectually lazy by encouraging them to absorb one-sided commentary instead of questioning what they hear,” Long said. “Overall, I think they are useful, but they have become too normalized as trustworthy sources when many of them simply are not.”

None of this is to say that podcasts are inherently bad. The format itself is not the problem, the problem is the absence of reliable consequences for being wrong, and mechanisms for policing. 

We tend to worry about misinformation where it is loud and obvious. Podcasts are dangerous because they are neither. They are calm, conversational, and for these reasons, increasingly influential.

Put your tinfoil hat on: You shouldn’t dismiss conspiracy theories

0

When you think about conspiracy theories or theorists, you probably imagine a crazy person with a tin foil hat going on about how people in the government are lizards. You might also think about that meme from “It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia” where Charlie Day’s character scribbles over the wall like a madman.

But, not everyone who’s a theorist wears their tin foil dunce hat. In fact, some conspiracy theories have solid evidence and end up turning out to be true. 

In a day and age where everything really isn’t as it seems, it’s important to not brush off some theorists, because many have actually turned out to be correct. 

Below are just a few examples of conspiracies that have been proven true. 

MK Ultra

Rumors that the U.S. government was making strides on mind control circulated during the 1960s. Those rumors sounded like something straight out of a science fiction novel. That was until government documents clarifying this dystopian idea were declassified in the 1970s.

From 1953 to 1973, the CIA conducted illegal and highly unethical experiments on unwitting U.S. citizens, according to a senate select committee. The agency administered LSD and other drugs to prisoners, psychiatric patients and even military personnel.

They utilized psychological torture and employed sensory deprivation in an attempt to develop mind control and interrogation techniques to use against the Soviet Union. 

With other controversies surrounding government trust at the time the files were declassified, it was safe to say that many people’s trust in the federal government had been punched in the gut. 

The ultimate false flag: Operation Northwoods

Believe it or not, U.S. military officials wanted to stage a terror attack on American soil targeting American civilians as an excuse to invade Cuba according to declassified files. The plan known as Operation Northwoods was a real drafted plan by U.S. military officials in 1962. It would’ve been an unthinkable notion that the military would create a plan that would kill American citizens, especially to justify a conflict with a man like Fidel Castro.

Castro had implied that he would be willing to destroy Cuba over surrendering to the U.S in a letter to Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev following the Bay of Pigs fiasco, which can be found on the JFK presidential library website.

Declassified documents revealed a proposed plan of committing acts of terrorism in major U.S. cities, including Miami, and blaming the attacks  on Cuba to manufacture public support for a war against Castro. Again, The Bay of Pigs invasion had failed in dramatic fashion. 

Thankfully, President John F. Kennedy rejected the plan, but the paperwork remains a chilling reminder of what military leaders were considering. 

The Watergate cover-up

The Watergate cover up is the gold standard of modern political conspiracies. When a group of men broke into the Democratic National Committee headquarters at the Watergate complex in D.C. in 1972, it was initially dismissed as a third-rate burglary. 

The idea that the president of the U.S. was intimately involved in a criminal espionage ring and a massive cover-up seemed far-fetched. To some, it may have even been seen as a poor attempt at pivoting by Democrats to blame the loss of 1968 and potential loss they would be facing in November on Republican sabotage.

It certainly wasn’t believable enough for most Americans in 1972, having virtually zero impact on President Richard Nixon’s historic landslide victory against George McGovern. 

But thanks to relentless investigative journalism and subsequent congressional hearings, the public learned the truth. The conspiracy went all the way to the Oval Office, ultimately forcing Nixon to resign in 1974. 

Unanswered questions

Other conspiracy theories that have yet to be proven true but have drawn massive speculation include Jeffrey Epstein’s suicide, the assassination of President Kennedy and the OJ Simpson murder case. Even with some of these cases being half a century old, they still raise questions about the trust people place in those in charge, and about cracks in the justice system. 

With the recent release of the Epstein Files, many secret dealings and emails have been revealed about who Epstein dealt with over the years — including with prominent politicians and celebrities. There is further scrutiny over the security footage and guard logs on the night Epstein committed suicide in a New York jail, showing a three minute jump in time with not much explanation, also fueled speculation about whether he did kill himself or not. 

In 1972,  the house select committee found that there was likely a conspiracy to kill President Kennedy. Whether President Johnson, the Soviets, or any of the other groups theorized had been involved in the killing has never truly been determined, or even outright dismissed. Even 60 years later when President Donald Trump released new files about the assassination, no new information was revealed.    

The entire world was glued to their TV sets in 1994, when former NFL Running back OJ Simpson was charged with the double murder of his ex-wife and her friend. Simpson was found not guilty in 1995, but the case officially remains unsolved. While several theories have been proposed, the main one still centers on Simpson. 

These claims have been backed, for a lack of a better term, by the evidence used in the trial of the century. These include Simpson’s blood at the scene and the blood of both victims being found in a sock at his house — all pointing the bloody glove at him.

But it was his daring hypothetical confession, “If I Did It” that was released in the early 00’s, which details how Simpson would’ve likely killed Brown and Goldman that further fueled speculation. An interview with his former agent Mike Gilbert in the ESPN special “OJ: Made in America,” supports the widely accepted theory that Simpson was guilty.

In the final episode of the limited docu-series, Gilbert details the final night he and Simpson spent at the Rockingham Estate, the home Simpson lived in during the years before and after the murders. 

Gilbert says he asked Simpson why he did it. Simpson calmly said, Gilbert claims, that had Brown not answered the door with a knife she would have lived. 

Simpson died in Apr 2024 still publicly maintaining his innocence. Leaving one of the most famous murder cases in American history to remain permanently unresolved.

While most conspiracy theories on the internet today are baseless, history shows us that we shouldn’t blindly trust official narratives without question. Healthy skepticism is a vital part of democracy. Especially when something goes “unsolved” on the books like the Simpson case.

The next time someone brings up a wild theory, just remember: Even a broken clock is right twice a day.

Media literacy matters now more than ever

News alerts appear on our phones, headlines fill our social media feeds and videos are circulated across platforms almost instantly after being posted. Information is constantly at our fingertips. But with that access comes a growing challenge: distinguishing what is true from false. 

Artificial intelligence, misinformation and hostile polarization toward the press make that distinction even more difficult. 

The spread of false information has created an urgent need for media literacy and responsible reporting.

Fake news, misinformation and disinformation

Fake news refers to false or misleading information presented as legitimate reporting. While some of this content is created as satire or for entertainment purposes, much of it is designed to mislead audiences and influence public opinion. 

Not all false information is spread with harmful intent. Misinformation occurs when inaccurate information is shared unknowingly, while disinformation is deliberately created to deceive. The intent of each is different, but both contributed to confusion and misunderstanding. 

As artificial intelligence continues to evolve, the line between real and fake is becoming increasingly difficult to identify. AI tools can generate realistic images, videos and text in seconds, allowing fabricated content to spread faster and appear more convincing than ever before. 

“If someone wants to find a seemingly realistic post that supports their stance, they easily can — even if the information shared is false,” said Yolanda Del Pino, a member of UM’s Debate Team. “This leads to many sharing misinformation, since the audience themselves don’t know it’s false.”

OpenAI’s recent decision to shut down Sora — a generative AI video model — is a big win in the fight against fake news, but AI generated videos were and still are rampant across social media. This week, it’s the controversial Love Island fruit, but what will it be next? 

Even harmless content — like viral videos of animals doing unrealistic tricks like jumping on a trampoline — demonstrates how believable AI-generated media has become. But when applied to political or social issues, that same realism can have far more serious consequences. 

Unlike in traditional newsrooms — where stories are reviewed, fact-checked and edited by multiple people — many social media influencers post without a second set of eyes looking over their content. Our attention spans are too short to fact check everything and we scroll to the next video, often without a second thought. 

“In a media environment shaped by algorithms and emotion-driven content, media literacy isn’t optional — it’s a civic skill,” said UM Communications Professor Ana Francois. “Understanding how information is produced and circulated is essential to making informed decisions.” 

Bias in media 

Bias within media organizations just further complicates how audiences are interpreting information. 

It is well known that many media organizations are biased. According to AllSides, outlets like The Atlantic, The Guardian and The New York Times are left leaning, while Fox News, The Federalist and the New York Post lean right.

Del Pino participated in a campus-wide St. Patrick’s day debate on March 17 about whether social media companies should be held liable for misinformation. 

“The debate definitely strengthened how distinguishing between misinformation and fact has become a problem in social media,” said Del Pino. “Though it is information unintentionally shared, it still worsens the political polarization.” 

Although bias does not automatically mean falsehood, it does create blind spots for readers. While two outlets on the opposite end of the political spectrum may produce the same content, the framing could cause audiences to accept misinformation that aligns more with their views.

Media biases also come with disinformation campaigns. They capitalize on the reader’s existing views, sharing a false headline confirming what they already believe about the “other side.” This contributes to the already polarizing climate in America, affecting the trust in and the freedom of the press.

People are becoming increasingly distrustful of journalists, according to Pew Research. 

The term “fake news” has been used by politicians to describe pretty much anything they do not agree with. 

Newsrooms have become battlegrounds for polarization — instead of seeking for the most accurate source, readers are looking for the source that best sides with their views. This is known as confirmation bias, which can lead a person to have overconfidence in their personal opinions. 

It is important to consume media from different sources to get the most accurate information possible

What needs to change and The Hurricane’s role

As media landscapes continue to evolve, both journalists and consumers must adapt. 

Headlines carry more responsibility than ever in this age dominated by short-form news and rapid media consumption. Responsible reporting starts with accurate, thoughtful headlines that inform rather than mislead. 

Speed should not come at the cost of accuracy. Rushing to be the first to post about a breaking issue can be extremely risky. If something is posted without being fact checked, it is easy to make mistakes. These mistakes contribute to the spread of misinformation. 

At the same time, audiences should be more conscious of how they consume this type of content. Rather than immediately resharing or reposting, taking the time to actually read the full article can help mitigate misinformation. Slowing down, questioning sources and seeking multiple perspectives are essential steps in becoming more media literate. 

“Fake news thrives when audiences stop asking basic questions — who created this, why it exists, and what evidence supports it,” Francois said. “Media literacy helps audiences slow down and think critically, especially when misleading content can look convincingly real.”

As a trusted source of information for students and faculty, it is our responsibility to uphold journalistic standards while distributing accurate, verified news to a growing campus community.

If you have information to share with TMH, submit a tip through the link on our website or in our bio on Instagram @themiamihurricane.

Fake News 101: How to spot it, stop it and maybe even laugh at it

0

Fake news has become an undeniable shadow in modern life — one that follows every scroll, every headline and every breaking news alert that flashes across our screens. As misinformation spreads rapidly, media literacy has never been more critical than it is today. 

It doesn’t always look dangerous. Sometimes it’s dressed up as a shocking statistic. Sometimes it’s a blurry screenshot. And sometimes, it’s so ridiculous it almost feels like satire — except when it isn’t.

In an age where information moves faster than verification, the line between truth and fiction has never been easier to blur. And while misinformation has always existed, its reach and its impact on people has grown exponentially.

So how can  you tell what’s real?

Spotting fake news isn’t about being cynical — it’s about being curious. The best readers don’t blindly consume information, they question it. 

As artificial intelligence adds new challenges to verifying what we see online, it’s important to remember what news is supposed to be: truthful, reported stories about real people and the real world. If people want to share facts instead of fueling falsehoods, a few simple habits can help.

Check the source, not the headline

If a headline feels designed to evoke an immediate reaction — anger, shock, outrage — that’s your first clue to pause. Look at where it’s coming from. Is it a reputable outlet, or a site you’ve never heard of? Read the publication’s “about” page. Look at other stories it has published. A credible source will usually be transparent about who runs it, who writes for it and what its editorial standards are. 

If the site is filled with sensational headlines, little sourcing and lacks clear authorship, that should raise concerns. 

If it sounds unbelievable … it probably is

Fake news thrives on extremes that are designed to hook you, not inform you. Some of these fake stories are so over-the-top and ridiculous that they collapse under their own absurdity. Recognizing that is part of media literacy too. 

Misinformation often relies on people reacting before they think, especially when the claim is dramatic enough to feel urgent. That is what makes it effective — it pushes people to repost first and verify later.

“I repost a lot of news on Instagram especially, but I want to make sure it’s true before I do that,” a UM student who wished to remain unnamed said when asked about the rate at which misinformation spreads. “I don’t want to repost clickbait.” 

If something doesn’t sound plausible, that does not automatically make it false — but it should make you slow down. Extraordinary claims need extraordinary proof. If a story is trying harder to shock you than inform you, that is a sign to be cautious.

Look for evidence

Real journalism always shows its work. Reliable reporting tells readers where information comes from, whether through named sources, public records, interviews, documents or verified data. 

If an article makes a major claim without showing where it came from, that should set off alarm bells.

Readers should also pay attention to whether quotes seem complete and completely in context. A screenshot of a quote or a single sentence pulled from a longer interview can often be misleading if the surrounding context is missing. 

A good rule of thumb is that the more serious the claim, the more important it is that there is clear evidence supporting it.

Cross-check the story

One of the easiest ways to test a story is to see whether other reliable organizations have confirmed it. Search key details — not just the exact headline — and compare how different outlets are covering the same claim. If only one obscure account, blog or page is talking about it, always verify the story with another source.

Cross-checking also helps readers see whether facts are consistent across reports or whether details begin to fall apart under scrutiny. In a digital environment where anyone can post anything, verification often comes from comparison.

“If it seems insane, I usually believe that it is, unless I see multiple [outlets] reporting on it,” said another UM student who requested to remain unnamed. 

If it’s real news, multiple credible outlets will likely be reporting it. If it exists only in one corner of the internet, that might be worth pausing over.

At the end of the day, fake news doesn’t spread on its own. It spreads when people trust too quickly, share too fast and question too little. 

Thankfully, that can be fixed. 

But it starts with you. 

Starbucks on campus sees rise in theft reports and drink mix-ups

Starbucks mobile orders are going missing, and students believe that they are being stolen. 

According to a non-scientific survey posted on The Miami Hurricane’s Instagram story for 24 hours, more than one third of 35 respondents reported their drinks missing upon arrival. Of that figure group who marked that their drinks had been missing, nearly one third said it happened multiple times. 

A student and former Starbucks employee who wishes to remain unnamed, has dealt with multiple instances of drink-theft, both while working behind the counter and as a customer. 

“I watched a girl steal my drink yesterday when the cafe was pretty empty,” she said. “I know several people who have had their drinks stolen at this location, including friends and customers reporting it to us during the time I worked at this Starbucks store in Shalala.”

While reporting her stolen drink to a UMPD deputy, the student said that another student also approached the deputy and said that her drinks had also been stolen multiple times. 

According to the police report, an unknown white female in a gray sweat suit and gold headphones took the unnamed student’s beverage and exited the Starbucks. UMPD CCTV footage confirmed that the suspect left campus with the beverage, and headed towards the Metro Rail. 

Jessi Kaplan, a junior at UM, also experienced a missing mobile order. 

“I was so upset. I have a very busy schedule. I just needed a little pick-me-up,” she said. “I had been waiting for so long. I asked them if my order was ready, and showed them my confirmation, and they said they couldn’t find my order. So, it was definitely stolen.”

More than 80% of survey respondents said they would report their stolen drink to a staff member to remake the order. However, the unnamed student and former employee said that approach may not benefit the customer nor the employees. 

“It’s not fair for the customer to have to ask the barista about their drink after waiting pointlessly for 15 or more minutes in a busy crowded cafe,” she said. “Or [for] the barista who is often overwhelmed by the large number of orders already and now has to stop everything to remake a drink that was taken.”

Currently, no proof of order is required to pick up a mobile order. Mobile orders are placed on the counter with the customer’s name on it.

About 55% of respondents from the original survey say that closer monitoring by Starbucks employees would likely reduce drink-theft.

Mobile orders can be placed by either using the Starbucks app or Grubhub, where students can pay by card or Dining Dollars.

Miami Dolphins player shares his recovery journey with Substance Awareness Club

Miami Dolphins tight end Darren Waller collaborated with UM’s Substance Awareness Club to share his experience with substance abuse and his recovery journey on Tuesday, March 24.

Waller said that his first experience with drug use was at a friend’s house when he took hydrocodone in his sophomore year of high school.

“I was kind of depressed at the time, really anxious, really wanting to fit in and looking for something that would quiet all of the noise going on inside my mind,” Waller said

His substance use escalated by junior year of high school, drinking beer, liquor and smoking cannabis. Waller then went on to play football at Georgia Tech from 2012 to 2014, where his drug use became even more frequent.

“How much I could drink, how much I could smoke, that became my identity. It was around that time that I started to see like, ‘Oh, this is kind of different from everybody else,’” Waller said.

Despite Waller’s substance use, those around him did not initially notice any warning signs.

“It wasn’t really anything that anyone could pick up on. I could always give you a smile, make you laugh, I was getting good grades,” Waller said.

Waller’s experience is more common than some people may realize. According to the 2023 National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 22% of college students had taken an illegal substance within 30 days of taking the survey and that over a quarter of college students had a substance use disorder (SUD).

During the 2015 NFL draft, Waller was drafted by the Baltimore Ravens. He played for three years before he received a year-long suspension from the NFL for repeatedly failing drug tests.

A few months after receiving his suspension, Waller overdosed in August 2017 when he unknowingly took fentanyl.

“That was a moment that definitely opened the door for my life to change,” Waller said.

Waller spoke about the time he spent in a rehabilitation program following his overdose and emphasized how being honest with himself and others helped him in making a meaningful recovery.

“When you can get these things out and share them, you almost feel lighter emotionally, mentally, spiritually,” Waller said.

He also talked about other coping strategies he learned in the program that he used once he returned home, including journaling, meditating and taking walks.

“I may not be back in the league, I may not be making as much money as I was before, but I’ll at least feel good about the life I’m starting to make,” Waller said.

Before going back to the Ravens post-suspension, this time as a practice squad member, Waller worked at Sprout’s Farmers Market. He was later signed by the Oakland (now Las Vegas) Raiders ahead of the 2018 season, where he played in the last several games in 2018 and was given the opportunity to start in 2019.

“The work that I was doing in recovery was, I think, what allowed me to have the foundation to take that opportunity and capitalize on it,” Waller said.

Waller emphasized that isolation can be a major warning sign of substance abuse and gave the audience questions to ask themselves about people in their life that they are worried about.

“Are they around people on a regular basis? Do they say they’re gonna show up to certain places and they don’t?” Waller said.

According to the Mayo Clinic, financial and physical health issues as well as changes in behavior are additional signs of SUD.

For those seeking help for their substance abuse, Waller believes that people need to be motivated from within in order to truly make a recovery.

“People need to get tired of their own situation,” Waller said. “Even if they go down the path of recovery, but they’re doing it for a sport, another person, it will always fall on its face because it’s never about them.” 

To close out, Waller reminded people that their mistakes do not define them and that they can live a fulfilling life despite setbacks. 

“Even though we’re trying to walk a certain path, you don’t have to be perfect to have a successful life,” Waller said.

Substance Awareness Club president and founder Luke Bell was very appreciative of turnout for the event.

“This [support from students] is a full circle moment for me. This is a huge part of the reason why I’m sober,” Bell said.

The Darren Waller Foundation, a non-profit foundation started by Waller to help young people receive treatment for substance abuse, has more information about Waller’s story on their website.

Visit @umsubstanceawareness on Instagram to learn more about how to get involved in substance awareness-related events on campus.